Interactive Companion

BCDR Assessment

Select critical services, model composite availability, assess operational readiness, and validate commitment feasibility.

Provider scope

Source baseline: Microsoft Azure (Microsoft Online Services SLA (WW), May 2026 (verified 2026-05-15))

Use the five-pass model from Microsoft Learn to interpret definitions, measurement, exclusions, and claim process. Local snapshot: src/data/sla-snapshots/azure-sla-guide.html.

Coverage status: all SLA-indexed services are listed in the selector. Composite calculations include selected modeled options.

Quick Azure cross-check: AzureCharts SLA board (community mirror). Official commitment source remains Microsoft published SLA terms.

Verified Multi-Cloud SLA Sources

AZURE: Microsoft Azure (Microsoft Online Services SLA (WW), May 2026 (verified 2026-05-15))
AWS: Amazon Web Services (AWS Service Level Agreements index (verified 2026-05-15))
GCP: Google Cloud (Google Cloud Service Level Agreements index (verified 2026-05-15))
OCI: Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI SLA page with PaaS and IaaS Pillar reference (verified 2026-05-15))

Autosave is browser-local only. Export or print for durable records.

0. Foundational Interview

Capture the operational and business context that determines BCDR risk appetite.

Business criticality Reputation impact if unavailable Estimated churn risk (%) Maximum tolerated downtime (minutes) Recovery time objective (RTO minutes) Recovery point objective (RPO minutes) Cross-cloud connectivity resilience Recovery runbook quality Last real incident recovery duration (minutes) Similar major incidents in last 6 months Estimated revenue at risk per hour (USD) Estimated SLA penalty per major breach (USD) Customers directly affected by outage

Readiness score

High gaps

Medium gaps

RTO vs MTD

Reputation exposure

1. Critical Path Services

Add only services in the transaction path. Each service field is searchable inline.

Catalog coverage: 689 services total (Azure 128, AWS 321, GCP 165, OCI 75).

2. Availability Upper Bound and Commitment

Modeled availability upper bound

Monthly downtime budget

Yearly downtime budget

Customer availability commitment target (%) Internal safety margin above commitment (basis points)

Internal reliability target

Maximum supportable commitment

Feasibility check

Commitment risk index

Gap over monthly budget

Commitment risk statement

Previous readiness

N/A

Current readiness

Readiness trend

SLA contractual coverage

Contract confidence

Coverage interpretation

SLA prerequisites validated (topology and tiers) SLA exclusions and definitions reviewed Claim window and evidence process ready Service logs retained for SLA validation

4. Fastest Ways to Improve Availability

Resource-Specific APRL Recommendations

Recommendations are filtered from APRL using your currently selected resources.

3. WAF Reliability Crosswalk Coverage

Checks are provider-specific for single-cloud scope. Multi-cloud scope evaluates each provider separately.

Assessment Findings Register

Prioritized findings and actions based on interview inputs, commitment feasibility, and selected resources.

Scenario Simulator

Dependency failure scenario

Regional outage scenario

Data corruption scenario

Dependency budget burn

Regional budget burn

Data budget burn

Real incident duration

Modeled worst-case duration

Outage probability context

Business Impact Translation

Worst-case outage impact

SLA penalty exposure

Estimated churn exposure

Commitment vs Reality Bullet Chart

Visualize monthly SLA budget against real and modeled outage durations.

Decision Required

Translate risk findings into an explicit leadership decision.

Owner Accountability Register

Each high or medium finding needs an owner, due date, and risk reduction action.

5. Executive Evidence Pack

Executive narrative

6. Export Before You Leave

Downloaded locally from browser

This prototype uses local state only; no server-side data persistence is enabled.

No export yet in this browser session.